Inside-Out Voices

Featured

Back in the day parents, teachers, and caretakers would warn or advise their kinfolk (typically children) to “use your inside voice” when they were becoming too loud.

Even outside.

Described as a modulated, relatively calm voice considered polite and socially appropriate when speaking indoors (at home, in school, or at the office), an inside voice is opposed to an outside voice: the latter a strong, elevated voice considered acceptable when speaking outdoors to be heard above a crowd or other background sounds.

Inside or out, an inside voice means that you’re thinking about the eardrums of others and that you know how to communicate without hollering.

Such is not the case in Spain.

Spain is loud.

People — especially women — tend to use their outdoor voices everywhere and all the time. Especially in the streets and right outside their front doors. That’s where they socialize. The streets are their living rooms, reception areas to interact and communicate.

Perhaps that’s because, for the most part, houses in Spain (and Portugal) were built with spaces too small to accommodate gatherings and inside voices. So people, their families, and neighbors congregate in the street, speaking up without realizing how loud is their talk.

My grandmother looked down on the street (although she also disapproved of jeans and bell bottoms, popular at the time). She came from money, married into more, and lived in a 12-room apartment on the fourth floor of Madrid’s prestigious Salamanca barrio (neighborhood). There was plenty of room for guests to gather in one of her several sitting rooms. “Sólo los Fulanos de tal se quedan por las calles” (Only nondescripts stay out on the streets), she would say.

Of course, those were the days of Francisco Franco, “caudillo de España por la gracia de Dios” (leader of Spain by the grace of God), according to the coins, when one never used outside voices while walking the streets patrolled by stern faced guardia civil with firearms.

So, maybe using outside voices is a social thing learned from childhood: to be heard over one’s male siblings and family members, girls tend to lift up their voices. It could be, too, that screaming and screeching are learned and reinforced on unsupervised toddlers when they’re ignored rather than disciplined for running amok and yelling at the top of their lungs in supermarkets and other public places, where inside voices are expected.

Spain is loud, a country of outside voices and sounds.

Facing us on the same street is a family comprising a middle-aged woman, her elderly mother, a twenty-something young man without work and living at home, and two very young grandchildren. A husband appears periodically. From early morning until what we consider late at night (10:00 pm), they are in their doorway using loud, outside voices.

And it’s not only them.

Some women, especially, terrify our dogs with their loud, high-pitched voices. Men, too, project their bass and baritone tenors decibels beyond normal hearing levels. Sometimes, we’re not certain whether they’re having a heated argument or just an everyday discussion … so we mind our business and don’t get involved. Due to the often industrial nature of their workplaces, men can be heard using outside voices inside.

Why do the Spanish shout when talking?

Sometimes, people may shout to be heard. This is not necessarily rude but indicates full engagement with the discussion. One often hears Spaniards call out and even heckle during speaking engagements and performances. This is expected to be taken in jest.

“I live in Madrid and share a flat with a few Spaniards,” says Sofía. “It depends on the crowd, to be honest, but I found that Spanish girls in particular tend to get pretty loud, even for me (Italian f). I used to live in Germany before moving to Spain and I am not surprised to find the difference in decibels a bit jarring.”

Nuno, a Spaniard, responds: “We love being loud. Loud means friends. Loud means fun. Loud means interesting. Loud means fiesta. There’s nothing worse than a silent bar.”

Spain is a loud country.

The bread man leans too long on his horn during his morning runs up and down the streets. Machismo throttling of motorcycles going the wrong way on one-way streets is deafening, as if the whine of the loudest motors denotes riders with the biggest cojones (or vice-versa). The vendors at the outdoor market bark as part of their sales routine. Even the rumbling of cars with diesel engines momentarily stopped albeit beating and belching — along with their fumes — are enough to disturb the peace. Heck, there’s even slang in Spanish (ruidoso/a) or (escandaloso/a) to describe the noise. Language textbooks make note of Spain’s noise:

• Mike didn’t like going to the city because it was always so noisy.
A Miguel no le gustaba ir al centro porque siempre era muy ruidosa.

• María was happy when school started because the noisy children were gone for a while.
María estaba contenta cuando empezaron las clases porque los niños ruidosos se irían por un rato.

Excessive noise seriously harms human health and interferes with people’s daily activities at school, at work, at home and during leisure time. It can disturb sleep, cause cardiovascular and psychophysiological effects, reduce performance, and provoke annoyance responses and changes in social behavior. According to research by the American College of Cardiology, noise pollution is linked to an increase in cardiovascular problems. The stress of constant noise results in the more frequent release of cortisol — the infamous stress hormone — which damages blood vessels.

Noise has emerged as a leading environmental nuisance in the WHO European Region, and the public complains about excessive noise more and more often.

The noise levels in Spain are generally a little higher than one might find in other countries. In fact, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the only country higher on the decibel tables worldwide is Japan.

No matter where or when, Spain is loud.

“It doesn’t matter what time it is, or what type of environment. I have been having breakfast at 8:00 am in a restaurant with Brits and Swedes and there is conversation. I can make out every word they say from across the room … until one Spanish family arrives,” shares a Brit. “They arrive at the table with their speaker phones on because, apparently, they think I need to hear both sides of their loud conversation. And they ignore their children to the point that the kids are screaming for attention. When they do decide to acknowledge the kids, they scream even louder.”

Attempting to sound a bit more diplomatic, I’ve often said that the Portuguese evidence more soul, while the Spaniards are more spirited.

Nonetheless, much as I have been tempted to (nicely) ask a Spaniard to speak more softly, I remind myself that I am an expat for a time in their country. I have no right to intrude on their culture … or communication modus operandi, for that matter.

Yet, even foreigners are entitled to a fair share of accommodation and hospitality …

Last night, I was awakened after midnight by the voices of a man, his young son, and their dog cavorting in the street in front of our house. The ruckus continued for more than half an hour, awakening my dogs who began barking. Finally, I went to the window and said, “Es medianoche. Cállense, por favor” (It’s midnight. Please be quiet.).

And, no, I didn’t use my inside voice.

Bruce Joffe is publisher and creative director of Portugal Living Magazine.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

“Locura”

It’s “la locura.”

Craziness.

Not plain and simple, it’s complex and convoluted!

Netflix’s two-season adaptation of Gabriel García Márquez’s groundbreaking Cien Años de Soledad (100 Years of Solitude) is almost impossible to follow, given its plethora of characters and historical trajectory … often overlaid and intertwined.

The story is more palpable — and makes more “sense,” if that can be applied to this bestselling book — only by returning to its original premise: Marrying one’s first cousin or into our immediate family is a recipe for disaster. If not borne with tails, offspring will cause and suffer from craziness throughout the ages.

It’s the best way to understand the mythical town of Macondo.

Dealing with Portuguese Debt (Collectors)

Time and again, debt collector Intrum has proven its operations to be unethical and, possibly, even illegal.

Myriad complaints against the company frequently highlight aggressive debt recovery tactics and administrative errors.

Complaints about Intrum and its tactics are found on multiple platforms:

In the Livro de Reclamações: https://portaldaqueixa.com/brands/intrum-justitia-servicos-de-gestao-e-recuperacao-de-credito/complaints

On Deco Proteste: https://www.deco.proteste.pt/reclamar/empresas/intrum-portugal/87C498E1-928B2A617

On TrustPilot: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/intrum.pt?languages=all

On Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/PortugalExpats/comments/1tqvsqq/has_anyone_dealt_with_intrum/

Consumers frequently report receiving relentless phone calls and text messages regarding old or unrecognized debts, sometimes stretching back over a decade. They complain that Intrum attempts to collect legally expired or prescribed debts, often using intimidating language.

Multiple reviews mention being dunned for amounts that were already paid, settled, or cleared through legal agreements. Customers describe unhelpful or rude support staff when trying to resolve discrepancies, alongside difficulty getting through to the operator.

After parting ways with MEO (another consumer complaint accumulator), I was glad my ordeal with this oversize telecommunications provider was over and done with. I had copies of emails from MEO responding to my earlier complaints through Deco Proteste and the Livro de Reclamações about being unable to cancel my contract following its required “loyalty” period. MEO’s emails confirmed that my contract had been cancelled, all of its equipment returned, and that I owed nothing on my account.

Months later, however, I began to receive daily debtor letters from collection agency Intrum, threatening to make my life miserable if I didn’t respond to their messages sent using WhatsApp.

It should be noted that their messages were marked “No Reply” and that it was impossible to reach Intrum staffers on the phone number provided despite 20-plus rings, let alone to reach anyone who could speak English.

So, again I turned to the Livro de Reclamações and Deco Proteste, where I registered complaints online.

Intrum’s rebuttal to my complaints had been repeated over and again to others in a boilerplate note stating, in essence, “Don’t blame us … we’re just the messengers,” an unethical, inaccurate, irresponsible, and totally inaccurate response.

Neither factual nor forthcoming, Intrum neglected to reveal its role in this matter: Is it really representing MEO, or has it purchased MEO’s debt portfolio? If the latter, Intrum is actually the owner–not the agent.

Intrum acts as a debt buyer, purchasing massive portfolios of non-performing loans, utility bills, and telecom accounts (termed carteiras de malparado) from companies like MEO, NOS, banks, and utilities for a small percentage of the actual debt amount (often 5 to 10 cents on the euro). Once bought, the debt legally belongs to Intrum. MEO has already written it off as a loss and wiped their hands of it. If Intrum buys a €500 debt for €25 and manages to scare or pressure the consumer into paying the full €500 (or even a discounted €200 settlement), they make a massive return on investment.

In other cases, usually involving more recent debts (under 6 months old), Intrum is hired by MEO or other firms to serve as an external collections department. In this scenario, MEO still owns the debt, and Intrum earns a commission fee for successfully recovering the past-due payment.

The point, however, was moot in my case, as I’d already proven that I didn’t owe anyone anything.

Documented by correspondence from MEO which accompanied my complaint, any issues the telecommunications giant had had with me were already resolved—including all bills (faturas) paid.

My complaint wasn’t with MEO; it was with Intrum and its messages. Based on questionable and unsubstantiated data presumably provided by its clients (MEO, in my case), Intrum repeatedly threatened, harassed, and intimidated me using privileged, private information (i.e., my telephone number) to bombard me with objectionable SPAM.

I have appealed again to the competent authorities through Portugal’s official complaints portal, asking that Intrum be sanctioned for its abuses and repeated violations of consumer protection.

Handling a debt collection agency like Intrum Portugal requires a calm, documented, and cautious approach. Here are the most effective tips to manage their contacts and protect your rights:

Shift Everything to Writing

Avoid discussing details over the phone. Verbal agreements are difficult to prove, and debt collectors may use high-pressure tactics. Instruct the agency to send all communications, payment proposals, and debt breakdowns via email or registered letter (Carta Registada com Aviso de Receção). State your stance clearly. Use a simple phrase like: “I will only communicate regarding this matter in writing. Please send the complete breakdown of this alleged debt to my email/address.”

Demand Formal Proof of the Debt

Never make a partial or full payment just to get them to stop them from contacting you. In Portugal, making a payment can be legally interpreted as an acknowledgement of the debt, which resets the legal clock.

Under Portuguese law, you have the right to know exactly where the debt originates. Demand copies of the original contract, the last outstanding invoice, and the formal document showing that the original creditor assigned (sold) the debt to Intrum.

Check for “Prescription” (Legal Expiry)

In Portugal, many common consumer debts have very short expiration periods (prescription). So, verify the age: If the creditor does not legally demand payment within this window, they lose the right to collect it.

Know the timelines

> 6 months: Water, electricity, gas, and telecommunications (internet/phone) bills.

> 2 years: Services provided by commercial entities or educational institutions.

> 5 years: Alimony, rent, or interest on loans.

If the debt is past these limits, Intrum cannot legally force you to pay. However, prescription does not happen automatically—you must formally invoke it. Send them a registered letter or email stating that the alleged debt is prescribed under Portuguese law.

Know Your Privacy Rights (RGPD)

Debt collectors cannot call you at unreasonable hours, contact your workplace, or disclose your situation to family members or neighbors. Harassment is illegal here.

If they are calling a number you never gave to the original creditor, or if the calls are excessive, you can explicitly state that they are violating your data privacy rights under GDPR (RGPD) and demand they cease phone contact. In other words, revoke consent.

Create a Log

Document every interaction. Keep a record of the dates, times, emails and phone numbers Intrum uses to call you. Save all messages. Don’t delete any SMS, WhatsApp messages, or emails they send, as these can serve as evidence if you need to file a formal complaint.

Contact Them Directly

Send the debt collection agency a letter from your personal email so you have a digital time-stamp. If possible, ask for a read receipt. Contac t Intrum at this email: info.pt@intrum.com

If they do not reply to the email or continue harassing you, send your complaint via Carta Registada com Aviso de Receção (Registered Letter with Acknowledgement of Receipt) to their official Lisbon address:
Alameda dos Oceanos, 59 – Edifício Espace, Piso 1, Bloco 2 A/B – Parque das Nações 1990-207 Lisboa, Portugal. Keep the postal receipt.

Businesses are expected to operate in good faith. Through its actions, Intrum has proven its culpability.

If I weren’t a foreigner with legal and fiscal residency in Portugal, I would take Intrum to court and invite all others who have been inflicted by its indignities to join me in what’s known as a “class action suit.”

Intrum would never know what had hit them!

TRUMP-A-LOSER

Who were they kidding?

That MAGA “Midterm Convention” was nothing more than another circus side show gimmick created to attract media attention and distract us from issues that really matter:

> The Epstein files. Still not released, despite unanimous legislation passed by the GOP and Democrats alike.

> Affordability, inflation, and the ever-increasing cost of living. From fuel to food on the table, the upward price spiral shows no signs of slowing. Americans shouldn’t have to choose between health care insurance, putting food on their family tables, and gassing up their vehicles to keep working.

> The war in Iran. Will it ever end? Most informed diplomats and international politicians believe that Iran is winning. And to the victor go the spoils.

> American colonization. Have we already forgotten Trump’s invasion of Venezuela, naming Marco to govern it and appropriating its oil? Or back home, treating the nation’s capital as his own personal Lego-land while ignoring basic living needs — like water — of people in Puerto Rico?

> Blatant corruption at levels never, ever, seen before in the USA. Trump, his family, cohorts, and comrades are stealing taxpayer money hand-over-fist, making no efforts whatsoever to hide their greed and pay-to-play politics.

> Not in my backyard. Perhaps nothing has galvanized voters on the state and local levels as plans to build enormous data centers for AI financed by tech billionaires. That hasn’t stopped Trump from championing them.

> Greenland and Cuba. No, he hasn’t forgotten about them. He’s just otherwise engaged at the moment.

> Alienating allies. No nation around the globe trusts the USA anymore to honor its commitments and be trustworthy. Canada? America’s best friend and closest trading partner has made a mockery of Trump and his tweets.

> Toxic environment. As of the latest update by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the Doomsday Clock (often referred to as the Midnight Clock) is set at 85 seconds to midnight. This is the closest the clock has ever been to midnight in its history, reflecting an unprecedented level of global risk. The time was advanced to 85 seconds in January 2026, moving forward from its previous position. Yet Trump & Company have rescinded restrictions on oil drilling and coal mining, moving the clock even closer to our extinction.

> The economy. For the first time in its history, America owes more than it makes. Debt is crushing the USA as international investors seek safer havens for their money.

Of course, I could go on … especially since Trump’s “convention” is competing directly against the NFL.

But my point is this: The only media attention Trump & Company’s nefarious activities merit is an obituary.

Do You Still Love the USA?

Given my posts, that’s a question I’m often asked.

Yes, I still do love the “idea” of the USA and its revolutionary promise: a nation founded on freedom, equality, justice, and unalienable rights for all.

The true beauty of the United States lies in the enduring brilliance of its foundational idea: a visionary pledge of a nation built not on shared bloodlines, but on the radical concepts of universal liberty, justice, and human dignity. This ideal represents a beacon of hope that actively welcomed refugees fleeing oppression and embraced immigrants from every corner of the earth, acknowledging that their hard work and diverse heritage formed the very backbone upon which this great country was built. It is the idea of a vibrant melting pot continually striving to guarantee civil and domestic rights to all people, proving that a society can find its ultimate strength in its diversity.

In foreign affairs, this ideal translates into a commitment to global leadership that champions democratic values, defends human rights, and fosters collaborative alliances built on mutual trust, shared security, and international cooperation.

While the historical reality has often struggled to live up to these lofty principles, loving the idea of America means deeply cherishing this unfinished blueprint and the relentless, ongoing pursuit of a more perfect union.

THAT’S the United States I love.

What we have today isn’t a United States that exemplifies these values … nor is it a country that, because of its actions, I can love. 

Reflections

Passing a shop window, my attention was captured by an old man looking back at me from the inside out.

He looked vaguely familiar; but, my, how he’d aged.

Much like me!

Hunched over a beaten cane clenched hand over hand, his shoulders sagged and his back slouched, the weight on his weary feet barely holding him erect. Wispy white hair fell to his forehead like bangs shading his eyebrows which, curiously, had remained dark and fulsome.

Though clouded by age, his hazel eyes appeared to clearly see the series of snapshots shattering the glass separating us, moments which had shaped our years and brought us to this place:

Take-shelter drills during the Cuban missile crisis, civil rights marches, violent Vietnam war protests, Stonewall, the plagues of AIDS and COVID … each marched by, stopping to rest at a farm in Woodstock, New York. The Berlin Wall coming down, and men stepping onto the moon flickered as if hallucinations. Court cases like Reynolds v. Sims, Loving v. Virginia, Roe v. Wade, Obergefell v. Hodges, Lawrence v. Texas, Reynolds v. Sims, appeared in his vision and then slipped away quickly.

Still holding my gaze, the mirage in the mirror recounted a history of presidents and precedents:

• A president assassinated, the murder of his assassin, and the death of his assassin’s assassin … all reported “live” on our black and white TVs;

• That same president’s brother assassinated as he, too, campaigned to become the country’s number one man;

• A Democrat – from Texas yet! – inherit the presidency, but decide not to seek another term of his own;

• A president and his vice-president, both disgraced by scandals, resign from the two highest offices in the land;

• Our first “unelected” president, when the Speaker of the House succeeded his shunned predecessors;

• A Christian peanut farmer from Georgia elected president, but relegated to the back burners because of high interest rates and hostages in Iran;

• A beloved, second-rate actor become president and be shot;

• A father and son each elected president—the father for one term, his son for two;

• A president selected by a partisan Supreme Court when the votes were so close and election errors so many;

• A likable Boomer impeached while in office because of alleged real estate improprieties and his penchant for women;

• The first black man elected president of the United States;

• The first woman nominated to be our country’s commander-in-chief, only to be trumped by a lying, cheating, hateful, tax-evading, con man;

• A convicted felon and sex offender elected president twice after being indicted for instigating an insurrection and stealing classified documents.

No longer robust or capable of reacting physically, the observer wondered what this man in the window could do to offset the increasing travesties of justice.

Then he remembered the books he had written. The newspaper by-liners, magazine features, journal articles, and social media posts he had published.

Closing his bloodshot eyes, he bit his cracked lips, ground his implanted teeth, and wavered before moving towards an end within sight.

Across the Atlantic, in Portugal and Spain, his mind was still nimble.

https://www.amazon.com/Expat-Leaving-Bruce-H-Joffe/dp/1789554780/ref=sr_1_1

There Ought to Be a Law!

I am experiencing a number a problems with my Facebook account, which I’ve diligently reported to Facebook using its “Report Problem” form (with screenshots).

Last week in “Trusted House Sitters,” a group I belong to, someone posted a request for recommendations. Several comments followed. I added mine, saying, “We highly recommend Norma Schramm, who’s taken TLC of our dogs both in Wisconsin (USA) and now in Portugal:

Bruce Joffe

Aug 27, 2026

Highly recommended: Norma Schramm!

Shared on TrustedHousesitters

Immediately, my comment was deleted and replaced with this notice from Facebook:

Aug 27, 2026

We removed your comment

Why this happened

We don’t allow people to take actions at high volume that might bother others.

This goes against our Community Standards on spam.

HUH? High Volume?

It’s been over two months since — no reason was given — Facebook has allowed me to post or comment other than on my own profile feed or the two groups I created and administer.

I was given the option to appeal Facebook’s decision.

I did.

Today — 4 days later — I heard back from Facebook:

Aug 31, 2026

We did not restore your comment

Hi Bruce

We reviewed your comment again.

We confirmed that it does not follow our Community Standards on spam.

We know this is disappointing, but we want to keep Facebook safe and welcoming for everyone.

To keep people safe, we ask everyone using our technology to follow rules, such as our Community Standards or Terms of Service and relevant local laws.

By following the rules, you can help prevent your content being removed, activity restricted, or your account being suspended.

A button at the bottom of the notice allowed me to check my profile status. Here’s what it said:

Bruce Joffe

Profile has some issues

Account status

Be careful! Going against the rules too many times can cause restrictions on your account.

Actions we’ve taken

Information for people in the EU

In addition to the option to ask us for a review, you also have other rights.

Other options you have

You may be able to challenge our decision in court.

You may be able to refer our decision to a certified dispute settlement body.

I’m seriously considering challenging Facebook’s decision–whether in court or through a certified dispute settlement body.

Someone has to hold Facebook accountable.

There’s no way to contact responsible parties at this social media platform that’s making billions upon billions of dollars, despite its recent admission of culpability and enormous financial settlement.

The problems are never resolved and the only replies I receive are AI-generated from Facebook bots.

Unacceptable! So, I asked AI (Google):

“What email(s) can I use to contact humans working at Facebook directly?”

AI’s response?

“To be completely direct: Facebook (Meta) does not provide active, publicly monitored customer service email addresses that guarantee a human reply.

“If you want a guaranteed way to bypass the bots and speak directly with a human representative, you must subscribe to Meta Verified. Your monthly subscription grants you direct access to live chat and email support with actual human agents.”

Oh, yeah? Like I’m going to pay Facebook €15/month (€180/year!) to fix its systemic problems? So I get to correspond with a human to to correct Facebook’s glitches?

No way, José! That’s highway robbery.

IMO, if a business cannot provide free, active human support — whatever the issue — it shouldn’t be allowed to operate online.

I wonder if this is something that might interest EU authorities?

Hiding in Plain Sight

How artificial intelligence quietly took up residence in our inboxes, cars, cameras, bank accounts, and living rooms—long before most of us started worrying about it

Bruce H. Joffe*

At 7:03 on a weekday morning, a man in Lisbon reaches for his phone before he’s fully awake.

He checks his email first. A few messages sit in the inbox; dozens more have been silently diverted elsewhere—junk mail, phishing attempts, marketing blasts, the digital equivalent of flyers stuffed under a windshield wiper. He glances at the weather. He asks for directions to an appointment across town and is told to avoid one route because traffic is building near the river. He dictates a quick text instead of typing it. On the way out the door, his phone suggests the podcast he usually plays on Wednesdays. Later, his bank pings him to confirm a purchase that doesn’t fit his normal spending pattern. That evening, a streaming service serves up a crime series eerily calibrated to his taste, while a security camera at home decides the movement on the front step is a package, not a person.

None of these moments feels especially futuristic. None would make a compelling movie scene. There are no humanoid robots, no glowing red eyes, no disembodied machine voice announcing that civilization has entered a new era. There is only the filtered inbox, the optimized route, the recommended song, the fraud alert, the sharpened photograph, the personalized feed.

Yet artificial intelligence is omnipresent and omniscient in nearly every one of those moments.

Is it omnipotent, too? And are these qualities of AI good things or bad?

That’s the oddity of AI in public life. For years, the technology has been sold to us in two contradictory ways. On one hand, it has been framed as an impending revolution, always just over the horizon, promising either astonishing prosperity or social collapse. On the other, it already has seeped so deeply into ordinary routines that much of it no longer registers as something extraordinary. We talk about AI as though it is arriving tomorrow, even as it has quietly spent the last decade rearranging the texture of daily life.

The result is a strange kind of collective misrecognition. Ask people where AI figures in their lives and many will point to chatbots, image generators, or the latest software capable of imitating human prose, voice, and imagery. Those are the visible, headline-grabbing forms of AI—the kind that inspire awe, panic, or breathless TED Talk predictions. But the more consequential story may be the less theatrical one: AI as a background infrastructure, embedded in the systems that sort, rank, predict, detect, recommend, translate, and optimize.

In that sense, artificial intelligence has become less like a robot and more like plumbing. It sits behind the walls of digital life, unseen but constantly at work, shaping what we see, where we go, what we buy, how we travel, whom we hear from (and don’t), and which risks get flagged before they become crises.

AI is not one single thing. It is a sprawling collection of systems making assumed judgments on our behalf—some trivial, some useful, some manipulative, some indispensable.

To understand how thoroughly AI has become the substance of ordinary life, it helps to stop thinking of it as a master machine and start considering the kinds of work it performs every day. Increasingly, that work falls into four broad categories: predicting what we want, watching for what might go wrong, curating what we see, and making small decisions on our behalf.

In other words, we need to become adept at connecting the dots.

The Prediction Conglomerate

One of AI’s most pervasive talents is prediction—not in the mystical sense of foretelling the future, but in the more mundane, commercially useful sense of guessing what is likely to happen next: What song will you want to hear? What route will get you home fastest? Which word are you trying to type? Which movie are you most likely to watch when you’re too tired to choose carefully? How much money is in your bank account at this moment? Who has taken money out and put money in? What’s the correct spelling of that word you’re wrestling with in Spanish?

Recommendation systems are perhaps the clearest example of AI’s predictive abilities.

Streaming platforms like Netflix, Spotify, and YouTube don’t merely store content; they study behavior. They track what users click, skip, replay, abandon, and binge, then use those patterns to forecast what will keep a person engaged for one more song, one more episode, one more hour. In practice, this means that entertainment platforms are no longer passive libraries. They are active editors of our leisure, arranging choices in ways designed to feel intuitive, personalized, and a little uncanny.

That can be very dangerous and illegal. Take the case of social media, which operates on the same premise. Remember the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica scandal which involved the unauthorized harvesting of personal data from an estimated 87 million Facebook users to micro-target voters during the 2016 U.S. presidential election? The personal data was used to build psychological profiles to influence voters in favor of political campaigns, most notably those of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.

Following global outrage and an undercover investigation exposing corrupt practices by CEO Alexander Nix, Cambridge Analytica shut down in May 2018. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was forced to testify before the U.S. Congress, and the company later agreed to a $725 million class-action privacy settlement alongside a $5 billion fine.

How do I feel about knowing that AI is always lurking around, studying me everywhere and recommending what it presumes I would want to see, hear, or do based on my past behavior?

The same predictive logic animates navigation apps. A map app does not simply tell you the shortest route from one address to another; it predicts how traffic is likely to behave by the time you reach a particular interchange, whether an alternate road will save three minutes, and how thousands of other drivers are moving through the same geography. The estimated arrival time on a phone screen is not neutral. It is an algorithmic forecast, continuously revised as conditions change based on real-time data and patterns. That is, assuming it works. Often it doesn’t. Especially in later model vehicles whose GPS and navigation capabilities are based on your mobile phone and the car’s software being in sync and cooperating with each other.

AI algorithms are very different, however, from other qualitative and quantitative metaphysics. Both the primitive Dewey Decimal System and Library of Congress classification and coding systems were archetypical algorithms that helped us to find information easier and quicker. But they were neither predictive nor predatory. AI can be – and is – both.

Prediction also lives in the keyboard. Autocorrect, predictive text, grammar suggestions, “Smart Compose” in email, and even the quick one-tap replies that appear beneath a message all rely on the same premise: language is “patterned” enough that software can guess what a human is about to say or think. Sometimes the guess is useful. Sometimes it is absurd. Either way, it reflects a quiet but radical shift in the relationship between people and their machines. We no longer are simply using tools to write; increasingly, the tools are trying to write alongside or ahead of us.

Does that compromise our creativity? No longer do we scratch out and substitute something different and, hopefully, better (or erase, for that matter). We needn’t even rely on the backspace button on our keyboards. Because no matter the changes we make, AI adapts and adopts them. And continues insisting that it is merely an adjunct, helping us simply to do and make better.

Where does our inherently human train of thought fit amidst this predisposed writing?

Online shopping is fundamentally predictive. It begins when deciding whether “apple” means the fruit or Apple the computers and smart phones. Retailers track what customers browse, compare, buy, and leave behind in abandoned carts, then use those signals to infer taste, price sensitivity, urgency, and intent. The recommendation for the waterproof hiking socks that appears after you buy hiking boots is not random. It is a probabilistic judgment about who you are as a consumer and what you are likely to do next. If Amazon seems to know what you want before you do, that’s not magic. It’s pattern matching at scale.

The cumulative effect of all this prediction is subtle but powerful.

AI does not merely respond to our choices; it increasingly anticipates them, arranging digital life around what it assumes we are about to want

In plain English, AI is curating our reality one swipe at a time.

Foxes in the Hen House?

If one branch of everyday AI exists to anticipate desire, another exists to detect trouble.

This is the less glamorous side of the technology, but often the more valuable one: systems trained not to tease and delight us, but to notice when something is off.

Email spam filters are the veteran workhorses of this category. They scan incoming messages for patterns associated with fraud, phishing, manipulation, and bulk solicitation, quietly sparing users from a flood of junk and scams. Because they work so well most of the time, they have faded into the background. But the ability to distinguish between a legitimate invoice, a political fundraising plea, and a fake password-reset message is not a trivial technical feat. It is a continuous act of machine judgment, built on recognizing ever-changing patterns of digital deception.

It is here, I believe, that AI has gone too far and invades our privacy.

Yahoo Mail now reads my correspondence and, for almost every email I receive, categorizes it, tells me what it’s about, and provides a summary of the content. Sometimes, it even hints at (or suggests) how I am being asked to respond and what actions I should take.

Banks and credit card companies do something similar with money. When a card issuer texts to ask whether you really made a purchase in a city you’ve never visited or flags an online order that doesn’t match your typical spending behavior, it is often responding to an AI system trained to detect anomalies. The software is not “thinking” in any human sense, but comparing the present against a history of past behavior and asking a practical question: does this look like you? Did you do this? (No need to respond if, indeed, you did.)

Moreover, a lot of “Press 1 for billing” systems are now smarter than they sound.

The same logic is moving into homes and cars. Smart doorbells and security cameras distinguish between people, packages, animals, and harmless motion, reducing false alarms while turning ordinary household surveillance into a more selective form of machine attention. Refrigerators inform us when we’re running low on certain groceries. Wearables and smartwatches watch for irregular heart rhythms, unusual sleep disruptions, or sudden changes in biometric patterns. Modern cars monitor lane position, blind spots, nearby vehicles, and sometimes even signs of driver fatigue, sounding alarms or nudging behavior before a lapse becomes an accident. If my 2025 Open Astra suspects that I’m edging out of my lane or too close to the road shoulders, it physically pushes the car back into place.

Does this resemble the cinematic AI of science fiction? Or is it something both more prosaic and useful: software standing guard over the unnoticed vulnerabilities of daily life, scanning for the suspicious charge, the dangerous drift, the missed cue, the thing that doesn’t fit.

So far, so good, huh?

Minding My Business

Prediction and protection are only part of the story.

Some of the most powerful AI systems in everyday life do not simply guess what we want or warn us about danger. They decide what we see in the first place.

This is most obvious on social media, where the feed has become one of the defining AI products of the modern era. What appears on Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X, or YouTube is not simply a chronological record of what other people posted. It is a ranked and filtered stream assembled by systems designed to maximize attention. AI decides which posts rise, which disappear, which videos autoplay, which creators gain momentum, which comments are hidden, and which ads seem to follow users from one app to the next. The feed can feel organic, even intimate, but it is the result of relentless technological curation. These social media have now invaded my personal email, advising me about job openings I should apply for, suggesting people to friend or follow, alerting me not to miss a given post, podcast, or person on their platforms.

News platforms increasingly work the same way.

Apps and websites recommend stories based on reading history, rank headlines according to predicted interest, and use moderation tools to suppress spam, abusive comments, or suspicious activity. In principle, this makes digital information easier to navigate. In practice, it also means that AI is helping shape the architecture of public attention—what seems urgent, what appears popular, what is amplified, and what quietly disappears.

Search engines belong in this category, too. They are often discussed as neutral gateways to information, but modern search is as much about curation as retrieval. AI helps determine what a query means, which sources deserve prominence, and what kind of answer format—webpage, map, video, snippet, shopping result—will most likely satisfy the user.

Gemini (owned by Google/Alphabet), ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Meta AI, and others are quickly replacing Snopes and other fact-checkers. See something posted on social media that doesn’t seem kosher? If it’s questionable, just ask one of these AI engines. Not only will they tell you whether it’s true or false but provide a history and context framing it.

How easy AI makes it to find information!

Who was the actor that played a given TV character? What warning is an H5 code on my air conditioner giving me … and what should I do about it if I can’t find the manual that came with the appliance five years ago? When did man first walk on the moon? Where can a find a particular product nearby (or online)? Why won’t my keyboard characters match what’s appearing on the screen … and how do I correct this? How do I say something in Spanish, French, or Swahili?  

Search no longer simply finds information. It organizes a version of the world and presents it back to us in ranked order.

This may be AI’s most underestimated power: not just to respond to human curiosity, but to structure it. To place certain choices, ideas, products, and stories directly in front of us while leaving others in the shadows.

That’s why, when in doubt, I tend to use more than one AI program to double-check another.

Making Decisions for Me

Another category of everyday AI feels almost administrative yet may be the most consequential of all: systems that make small decisions on our behalf so routinely that we barely notice the delegation.

When a customer-service chatbot decides which support path you need, when a call-routing system infers whether you are calling about billing or a lost password, when a hiring platform ranks one résumé above another, or when a translation app decides how to render your sentence into another language, AI is not merely making a suggestion. It is making a choice—sometimes a minor one, sometimes a consequential one—about how the world should be sorted and how a person should proceed through it.

AI is not just recommending content. It’s learning what version of content gets our attention.

Hiring software offers one of the clearest examples. Employers increasingly rely on AI to screen applicants, match résumés to job descriptions, and surface candidates who appear most relevant. On paper, this can sound efficient, even rational. In practice, it means that invisible systems may determine who gets noticed and who gets filtered out long before a hiring manager enters the picture. A messy, subjective human process does not become neutral simply because software now helps administer it. It’s not always fair or accurate, but it is very common.

Customer service works similarly, if on a smaller scale. Chatbots and automated support systems now answer routine questions, summarize previous interactions, draft replies for human agents, and steer customers toward specific solutions. Translation tools make judgment calls about tone, phrasing, and context. Meeting software decides how to transcribe spoken language into text. Smartphone cameras decide how aggressively to brighten a night shot, smooth a face, or blur a background. None of these are monumental decisions. But together they reveal something important about the trajectory of AI: much more of modern life is being mediated by systems that quietly decide, sort, classify, and act before a human intervenes.

That delegation is seductive because it feels efficient. It reduces friction. It saves time. It spares us from tiny acts of effort and judgment. But it also normalizes a world in which mechanisms make more of the small calls that shape daily experience—not only what we consume, but what we miss; not only what gets flagged, but what gets through; not only what gets recommended, but what gets decided for us in advance.

And for whose benefit?

Technology We’ve Already Accepted

The easiest mistake to make about artificial intelligence is to think of it primarily as a future event—as a dramatic threshold we are about to cross. This is the version of AI that dominates public argument: the chatbot that might replace writers, the autonomous agent that might replace office workers, the bots that flood politics with misinformation, the automated supermarket checkout that replaces cashiers, the machine that might one day become out of our control.

Those concerns are not imaginary. But they can obscure a simpler and more immediate truth: much of the AI revolution has already happened … and it happened quietly.

It happened in the inbox, where spam filters became smarter than human patience. It happened in the map app that rerouted the commute. It happened on the streaming platform that learned our tastes, the bank that learned our spending habits, the camera that learned how we preferred to look, and the feed that learned what could hold our attention a little longer. It happened in the thermostat, the smartwatch, the résumé screener, the caption generator, the chatbot, the fraud detector, and the keyboard trying to finish our sentences.

A lot of what people think is a “better camera lens” is actually computational photography powered by AI. Most newer cars are already partial AI systems on whells.

That is what makes AI both less exotic and more important than popular imagination often allows. It is not just a spectacle of futuristic possibility; it is a layer of decision-making and prediction already embedded in the infrastructure of ordinary life. It can be useful, manipulative, protective, intrusive, efficient, biased, boring, indispensable, and unnerving.

Sometimes simultaneously.

Before we ask what artificial intelligence will become, it is worth recognizing what it already is: not merely a tool of the future, but a hidden collaborator in the present. A system of quiet judgments, small conveniences, and invisible interventions that have taken up residence in modern life so thoroughly that most of us notice it only when it fails.

The most common AI in our daily lives isn’t glamorous. It’s not humanoid robots or dramatic sci-fi stuff.

AI, in other words, is no longer just coming for the future.

It has already moved into the house, woven into the invisible plumbing of modern life.

*with a little help from AI.

Taking Trump to Task

Feeling deceived by their party and a president who deserted them, Magats are furious and have begun to eat their own.

When such major GOP influencers as Marjorie Taylor Greene, Laura Loomer, Tucker Carlson, Matt Walsh, and Steve Bannon (among others) publicly express outrage against this administration’s actions, we know that something’s stewing and rotten inside.

Driving the most recent hellabaloo is Trump’s decision, announced by his defense (“war”) secretary, Pete Hegseth, that the USA would allow Qatar to build a military base in Idaho.

The move comes months after Trump accepted a luxury Boeing 747 from the Qatari government, which drew criticism from both Democrats and Republicans, including Loomer.

In an executive order, Trump also declared that the United States will regard any attack on Qatar’s territory, sovereignty or critical infrastructure “as a threat to the peace and security of the United States” itself. Quite notably, the language of the executive order closely resembles the security guarantee that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) gives to member countries. (Qatar is not a NATO member).

MAGA feels betrayed.

Many conservative commentators questioned how the move is aligned with Trump’s “America First” agenda.

“There isn’t a single Trump supporter who supports allowing Qatar to have a military base on US soil,” argued Loomer. “I don’t know who told President Trump this was a good idea, but it has made people not want to vote. This is the type of thing I would expect from a President Ilhan Omar.”

Conservative commentator Amy Malek wrote in an X post: “Qatar has spent $100 billion buying influence in the U.S., and it’s paying off. I am in shock that Washington would approve a deal letting Qatar, Hamas’s #1 financier, open a Qatari Air Force facility on U.S. soil. Qatar bankrolls Hamas, ISIS, the Taliban, al-Nusra, and the Muslim Brotherhood. This isn’t ‘shared defense goals.’ It’s a shared delusion. We’re not building peace. We’re building a launchpad for the Islamic disaster.”

Conservative radio show host Mark Levin wrote in an X post: “I never dreamed of anything like this. We’ve not only agreed to go to war for Qatar but they’re now building an air force facility in our country. Shocking.”

Alexander Duncan, a Texas Republican Senate candidate, said in another X post: “Qatar is not an ally. Qatar is an Islamic State ruled by Sharia. Qatar has the same ultimate objective as the rest of Islam: to conquer the entire world until it is all under one Islamic State (Caliphate) ruled by Sharia.”

Trump himself earlier had condemned Qatar. In June 2017, Trump said Qatar “has historically been a funder of terrorism at a very high level” and supported a blockade against the country, led by Saudi Arabia and the UAE. 

A Qatar military base in the USA is only the latest in a series of actions taken by this felon in the White House that defy the Constitution, breaking laws, conventions, and convictions long held sacred by this country.

This isn’t an America anyone voted for.

MAGA, Trump’s base, holds him contemptible for lying and breaking promises made during his campaign to release the entire Epstein file. Since then, however, he’s employed every evasive tactic–including ignoring and firing essential personnel who strongly advised him against pushing his appointed admins for grudge and retribution indictments against such notables as former FBI chief James Comey,  New York Attorney General Letitia James, Fulton County (GA) District Attorney Fani Willis, former Trump National Security Advisor turned Trump critic John Bolton, and California Senator Adam Schiff.

Trump isn’t even hiding what he’s doing: the evidence is in his September 20 post addressed to Attorney General Pam Bondi which mentions Comey, James, and California Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff. “They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!” Trump wrote.

MAGA isn’t alone in its anger against Trump & Company’s actions.

  • The vast majority of Americans, including Republicans and those who identify as strong supporters of President Donald Trump, want Congress to renew the enhanced tax credits for people who buy their health insurance from the Affordable Care Act Marketplace.

Holding health care for Americans hostage, Democrats, Independents, and several Republican members of Congress are aghast at what the government shutdown can do to the USA’s stability … financial and family-wise.

Trump’s response – laying off even more essential employees from “Democratic” programs, departments, and agencies – isn’t helping, especially when increasing numbers of Americans are having difficulty getting their already earned Social Security payments.

  • Tariffs forcing Americans and countries worldwide to pay more for essential goods and services are the province of Congress … not the Executive Branch. Yet Trump has stamped and stampeded his will on these taxes, driving up “kitchen table” matters like the cost of living, rather than lowering them as promised.
  • Seeing armed and masked military causing havoc in the streets of such major cities as Los Angeles, DC, Chicago, Portland, Memphis (with others targeted to come), is provoking outrage throughout the country and around the world. Innocent people, law-abiding immigrants, and USA citizens are caught up in the carnage caused by unidentified men rounding them up, taking them down, and deporting them to places unknown.

Their devil-may-acre attitude with all of its trappings is horrifying many, including clergy caught up in the web. A federal agent firing pepper balls at protesters outside the ICE processing center in the Chicago suburb of Broadview last month struck a praying pastor in the head. Said another protesting pastor, “It’s like the gates of hell crashing against the kingdom of heaven.”

That’s why millions of Americans protest daily, culminating on October 18th with thousands of “No Kings” marches (referred to as “Hate America” riots by prominent Republicans and their newscasters) across the country, the Atlantic, and around the world.

  • Along with many Democrats, Independents and a few on the other side of the aisle, I find the insolence and arrogance of Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and RFK Jr. while testifying before congressional oversight committees revolting.

Bondi and Patel have politicized the USA’s Justice Department and FBI, while RFK Jr. has cut programs keeping Americans healthy, hearty, and hale.

  • Blackmail and intimidation are being used against the legal profession, educational institutions, government employees, our judicial system, and private citizens.
  • Increasingly, “insurrection” and “insurrectionists” are words used by this administration, preparing the nation for Martial Law.
  • Redistricting is held every ten years, following the official Census, not midterm for partisan favors initiated by the president and counter-balanced by states blue and red.

With lawmakers on a continuing hiatus, ignoring their roles and responsibilities as well as their constituents as dear leader assumes ever more control, “taxation without representation” is taking on a renewed meaning.

Millions of Americans are protesting daily, culminating on October 18th with thousands of “No Kings” marches (referred to as “Hate America” riots by prominent Republicans and their newscasters) across the country, the Atlantic, and around the world. Marches like these will continue over and again.

What else can we do to stop Trump’s march toward fanatical fascism?

Petition for impeachment hearings against not only Trump, but his entire team. The Constitution gives Congress the power to impeach federal officials: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. (Article II, Section 4). They’re all guilty!

► By all and every means, protest.

► Join organizations and online groups whose causes and concerns align with yours. There’s strength in numbers!

► Thousands of lawsuits, including 20 brought by states and at least 190 active cases are challenging Trumpian actions. Support them.

► Demand an independent investigation into how Trump “won” (or stole) the 2024 election. Many people wiser than me believe Trump conspired with Putin and Musk (et al) to put Trump over the top.

► Refuse to pay federal taxes. Are your elected officials truly representing you?

► Begin now to support candidates of your choice for the 2026 midterm elections.

► Petition for impeachment hearings against not only Trump, but his entire team. The Constitution gives Congress the power to impeach federal officials: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. (Article II, Section 4).

They’re all guilty!

The Biggest Lie

If the “Big Lie” purported by Donald Trump referred to his verifiable loss of the 2020 election, fact-checkers to his continuing series of reckless lies (“alternate realities,” as one of his first-termers called them) have counted hundreds — possibly thousands — of other lies … especially since he was elected to a second term.

But, perhaps, his election is an even a bigger lie?

“Donald Trump filled his first 100 days back in office with the same relentless lying and inaccuracy that was a hallmark of his first presidency and his 2016 and 2024 presidential campaigns,” stated CNN’s Daniel Dane, who listed 100 separate false claims from Trump since his inauguration on January 20, fact-checked concisely with hyperlinks to more information.

During his first term as the 45th President (2017–2021), The Washington Post’s Fact Checker team documented 30,573 false or misleading claims over four years, averaging about 21 per day. This number increased over time: roughly 6 claims per day in his first year, 16 in the second, 22 in the third, and 39 in the fourth, especially spiking around the 2020 election.

For his second term as the 47th President (starting January 20, 2025), CNN’s fact-check of Trump’s first 100 days (through April 2025) noted “relentless dishonesty” with at least 100 specific false claims identified, though they didn’t provide a daily average. NPR’s analysis of a single August 2024 news conference found 162 misstatements, exaggerations, or lies in 64 minutes, over 2 per minute. These snapshots suggest the pattern of frequent false claims has continued, though comprehensive data for the second term is still emerging.

PolitiFact, fact-checking Trump since 2011, reviewed 1,078 claims as of March 2025, rating about 77% as Mostly False, False, or Pants on Fire (their term for egregious falsehoods).

Trump’s falsehoods are unprecedented in scale and impact.

Critics note his repetition of false claims, like those about the 2020 election, exploits the “illusory truth effect,” where repeated exposure makes falsehoods seem believable, especially among supporters. Nonetheless, they’re still lies.

“During and between his terms as President of the United States, Donald Trump has made tens of thousands of false or misleading claims,” begins Wikipedia. “Fact-checkers at The Washington Post documented 30,573 false or misleading claims during his first presidential term, an average of 21 per day. The Toronto Star tallied 5,276 false claims from January 2017 to June 2019, an average of six per day. Commentators and fact-checkers have described Trump’s lying as unprecedented in American politics, and the consistency of falsehoods as a distinctive part of his business and political identities. Scholarly analysis of Trump’s X posts found significant evidence of an intent to deceive.”

So, it should come as no big shock that Trump is lying about his contribution to Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called Birthday Book. “Fake!” screamed Trump. And many of his Republican supporters on the Hill supported him, quibbling over the veracity of his signature.

They’ve got to be kidding!

This is no smoking gun. Rather, it’s not unlike Bill Clinton’s blue dress scandal. In November 1997, Monica Lewinsky told her confidant and supposed friend, Linda Tripp, that she had in her possession a blue Gap dress that still bore the semen stain that resulted from her administering oral sex to President Clinton in February of that year. In late July, 1998, Lewinsky turned the dress over to Kenneth Starr’s investigators after signing an immunity agreement. A blood sample was taken from Clinton on August 3, and on August 17, the FBI reported its conclusion that Clinton was the source of the semen on the dress “to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty.”

When news of the the existence of the dress surfaced in published reports in early August, politicians and commentators alike agreed that the blue dress proved Clinton lied when he denied a sexual relationship with Lewinsky. Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) called the evidence “very critical.” Senator Arlen Spector (R-Pa) agreed that it would be “the most powerful kind of corroboration” of an affair. A George Washington law professor, Jonathan Turley, appearing on “Meet the Press” said of the semen stain: “No one will be able to spin him out of that.”

A US congressional panel has released a redacted copy of an alleged “birthday book” given to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003 celebrating his fiftieth birthday. The 238-page book contains messages and photos sent by many of Epstein’s friends, including a letter carrying a signature resembling US President Donald TrumpThe alleged entry from Trump contains a signed note outlined by a sketch of a woman’s body. The final line reads: “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

Trump denied ever writing the birthday note.

As for his doodles and signature in the book, he’s lying when claiming that they’re not his, as doubters and forensic experts already have expressed. The Wall Street Journal reports that the signature is consistent with Trump’s autographs in the past.

If not Trump’s, whose are they?

Why would someone — over 20 years ago — insert a fraudulent, forged greeting that echoed a younger Trump’s bawdy behavior and his clearly documented friendship with pal Epstein? What could be a possible motive? By whom? To what end?

It makes no sense whatsoever.

Except that Trump, once again, is lying.

Rather than a red herring, he’s been caught red-handed in a really big lie that may well cost him voters, even among his base.

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee also released a photo from the book showing Epstein holding a novelty check selling a “fully depreciated” woman to Trump for $22,500.

Ironically, Jeffrey Epstein reportedly had an oil painting of Bill Clinton conspicuously displayed in his Manhattan townhouse. The artwork by Petrina Ryan-Kleid shows the former US president draped over a chair in the Oval Office, dressed in a blue dress and red heels recalling his tryst with Monica Lewinsky.

In December 1998, the House impeached Clinton for obstruction of justice and perjury after Starr and his team brought forth documents showing, among other allegations, that the commander in chief had lied under oath about a relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

Maybe this page from Epstein’s birthday book will turn out to be Trump’s semen-stained blue dress?

Food for Thought

It’s said that in these parts of the Alentejo, the best porco preto (“black pork”) is served in a town named Arronches, not far from Portalegre. We’ve come to love the sweet and savory taste of this pork … when well prepared. If not, it’s just another Portuguese dish.

Arronches is about 45 minutes from our home in Vila Boim, Elvas. We’ve passed by the place when visiting friends who live in the nearby village of Assumar; but we’ve never been to Arronches.

Today we went.

During this time of the year, many villages, towns, and cities in Portugal hold their own special ferias–holiday fairs. Somewhere online I’d seen that Arronches would be celebrating this weekend.

“Want to go?” I asked Russ earlier this week.

“Sure!” he replied. “Let’s see if we can finally find a good restaurant to try the porco preto.”

I searched on TripAdvisor and a bunch of other sites dedicated to recommending restaurants. On every single one of them, A Cabana (The Cabin) came up as #1 … with hundreds of 5★ and far fewer 4★ reviews. Its atmosphere was described as “romantic” (we found it charming and adorable) with prices ranging from € (Facebook) to €€-€€€ (TripAdvisor). Based on our tab, I’d say TripAdvisor is more accurate. In a way, the digs reminded me of a restaurant with the same name (The Cabin) on the outskirts of Sturgeon Bay, WI.

A Cabana doesn’t have its own website, but it does have a Facebook page. On Thursday, I messaged them to make a reservation for the two of us at 1:30 PM (13:30) on Saturday. We figured that would give us enough time to visit the fair and then eat a hearty meal early enough. Within five minutes — I kid you not! — I had a response: “combinado!” (confirmed).

Unless you’re an expat or immigrant living in Portugal, you can’t understand how unusual (even rare!) it is to receive a reply to one’s email or message here. The Portuguese tend to ignore them. You’re better off telephoning or stopping by.

Two thumbs up for A Cabana!

We arrived in Arronches at about 11:45 (AM), only to find ourselves lost in space. GPS and Google Maps were no help. Russ thought that the fair would be held in the “campo” (countryside), while I distinctly remember reading something about it being held in a pavilion. Before going around the bends another time, I asked Russ to pull off so that I could ask a local for information.

“Isn’t today a holiday in Arronches? Where can we find the fair grounds?” I asked a gentle giant of a man with a beard who nodded “yes” and pointed down the road … “Just continue going down this street until you come to he,” he said.

Russ turned to me before driving down the street to tell me, “He looks familiar. I think he might be the chef at A Cabana.”

Driving downhill, we finally approached the site. Amazing–there was plenty of parking! Very unusual in Portugal … especially when something of general interest is happening.

We soon understood why:

The only activity occurring at the fairgrounds when we arrived was a sheep competition. Nothing else. Not even the dozens of stalls selling food and souvenirs were open, let alone live music. It all would begin later that evening.

“What do you want to do?” Russ asked me.

“Let’s go to the restaurant and see if they’ll take us earlier,” I suggested. “That way, we can get an earlier start on doing some shopping we’d planned at E LeClerc, along with filling the car with GPL (liquefied gas) and washing it.

A bunch of people of all ages were already queuing up outside the restaurant, whose front door was open but nobody was inside. I approached the owner-chef-waiter — who, indeed, was the helpful man who’d given us directions earlier! — and asked if we could change our reservation to now rather than later. “Of course,” he said, pointing to the first of four tables for four. Behind them, in a row against the back wall, all of the tables were pulled together to accommodate 22 people … including those waiting outside, and then some.

“We understand that you make the best porco preto in town,” I told him while we both were standing in front of the chalk board where the menu was written.

He smiled broadly and recommended both the “secretos” (secrets) plate for €20 and the “plumas” (feathers) dish for €23. We ordered one of each, which came with salads and the best fried potatoes (“crisps,” per our British friends) we’d had in a while–super thin yet crispy, without any soggy orphans left behind. To go with our food, I had (two) glasses of tinto wine and Russ had (two) steins of beer.

It suddenly occurred to me that the maitre d was responding to my questions in Spanish, not Portuguese, although I was doing my best to speak coherent Portuguese. ¿No é portugues? (aren’t you Portuguese?) I asked him. “Sim, claro” (Yes, of course), he replied. “Then, why are you talking Spanish to me?” I asked in Portuguese. “I thought you were Spanish, he grinned.” It must have been my accent, One lesson I’ve learned since living in this western part of Iberia is always to speak Portuguese … to never initiate a conversation in Spanish, assuming the Portuguese understand it.

Anyway, everything was delicious!

The food, the service, the atmosphere were all extraordinary. (We personally preferred the plumas — cut thickly, parts cooked medium, others medium-rare to perfection — over the secretos.)

Of special note to us — who spend two months in Portugal and one month in Spain — was how relatively quiet and civilized the table of 22 behind us was. In Spain, you’d never be able to hear yourself think with that many people clustered together.

Our bill came to less than sixty euros. Although I tend to cringe when food here in Portugal costs that much, I reminded myself that we’d be gone from the USA for six years already. Who knew how much a meal like this would cost in a place like Sturgeon Bay?

Probably lots more.

Whatever …

It was well worth it!

P.S. If you plan to eat at A Cabina, remember to bring cash. The restaurant doesn’t accept plastic — credit or debit cards — although it does honor MB Way.

Pastor, professor, publisher, and journalist Bruce H. Joffe is an award-winning author of magazine features, academic research, journal articles, self-help manuals, and newspaper stories. His nine books deal with international (intercultural) living, progressive theology, gender studies, “social” politics, our vulnerabilities, marketing, and the media. 

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.