Purge the Evil

If you’re like me, you’ve been seeing increasing media coverage of the climate crisis – including pollution – resulting in death and devastation among creation. How many species have succumbed and died—some by natural evolution, others killed by our wanton ways?

I remember a Bible verse from the Psalms (24:1-2), “The earth is the Lord′s, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it; for he founded it upon the seas and established it upon the waters.”

Yesterday, the camera chronicled the sudden demise of coral which, in the circle and interconnections of life, protects fish, algae, and our shorelines from the ravages of weather. Coral cannot live in heated waters which recently have risen by more than 1.5 degrees and register 92.5F degrees currently around the Florida Keys.

As often happens, my mind wandered … until stopping at the story of Noah’s Ark.

I could be wrong (especially if we take into account the water turning into blood and the hail, among the ten plagues of Egypt, and the parting of the Red Sea), but I suspect that in the chronicle of Noah’s Ark, we find the first example of climate change and crisis. Remember? According to the story, it suddenly rained 40 days and 40 nights. Noah, his family, and animals entered the Ark on the day flooding began. It lasted 40 days and nights. The waters rose and all creatures, except those aboard, were destroyed.

In this account, Noah labored faithfully to build an Ark, ultimately saving not only his own family, but humanity itself and all land animals from extinction during the flood which God supposedly created after regretting that the world was full of sin.

After 40 days (and nights), the Creator was appeased. Noah sent out a dove, which returned with an olive branch indicating the presence, again, of land. And the Holy One made a promise – a covenant – in which he resets and renews the blessings of creation, reaffirming God’s image in humanity and the work of dominion. “Never again will all life be cut off by the waters of a flood; never again will there be a flood to destroy the earth. I have set my rainbow in the clouds, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth,” we are told by the author of Genesis 9:11 and 13.

Let’s not miss a vital point here …

Why are we told the Creator caused the flood?

Allegedly, because the world was full of sin.

This seems to be a theme in both books of the Bible, starting with Deuteronomy, whose core is the covenant that binds Yahweh and Israel by oaths of fidelity and obedience: God will give Israel blessings of land, fertility, and prosperity so long as it is faithful to God’s teaching; disobedience will lead to curses and punishment.

Remember: these blessings and curses are specific to Israel.

In Deuteronomy we’re told, “You must purge the evil from among you” (17:7). Several verses later (19:15-20), we are warned again: “Thus you shall purge the evil from among you. The rest will hear and be afraid, and will never again do such an evil thing among you (19). Thus you shall not show pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot (20-21).

Despite its Hebrew reference to Israel, the idea of purging evil reportedly continues in the Greek testament with Paul the Apostle – aka Saul of Tarsus, a Pharisee – reiterating, “God will judge those outside. Expel the wicked person from among you” (5:13).

Throughout all his presumed writings, however, Paul’s focus is purging what he saw as the “evils” inside of us, our “sinful” nature … although his Christianity ultimately led to the Inquisition, Crusades, and evangelical bullying. In the Hebrew scriptures, it’s the “other” and outsiders – peoples who worship foreign gods and idols – whom a jealous and zealous god used the Israelites to avenge.

Today, purging evil is paramount in subduing and saving ourselves from the climate crisis which threatens to destroy our world and ourselves. We must deal with the effects of a poisoned environment of our own making.

According to the United Nations, results of our changing environment already include intense droughts, water scarcity, severe fires, rising sea levels, tragic flooding, polar ice melting, catastrophic storms, volcanic eruptions and emissions, seismic earthquakes, shifts in plant blooming times, and declining biodiversity. The heat is getting more intolerable; floods and mudslides are destroying people and property; hurricanes and typhoons are coming at us faster and more furiously; air quality indices show how difficult it is to breathe; winter and summer seasons are starting earlier and lasting longer.

Our beliefs will have little to sustain us if we don’t purge these evils from among us.

Pastor Bruce is with People of Faith Online Congregation and publishes Portugal Living Magazine.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Happy July 4th …

What Independence Means to Me

Those who have followed my musings about the national elections which, already, have left the starting gate may recall that I was toying with the idea of third-party candidates.

I am well aware of the bleak history of those running against the Democrats and Republicans … especially in the cases of Gore v. Bush (2000) and Clinton v. Trump (2016). Without third-party contenders, election victories would easily have gone to Hilary Clinton and Al Gore.

For all the talk about why Donald Trump was elected president while losing the popular vote and how he could win again, one of the least discussed results of the 2016 election offers valuable lessons for Democrats.

An astounding 7.8 million voters cast their presidential ballots for someone other than Trump or Hillary Clinton. The two biggest third-party vote-getters were Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson (almost 4.5 million votes) and the Green Party’s Jill Stein (1.5 million voters). But others received almost another 1.9 million votes as well.

Their strong showing was due to the unpopularity of the two major-party nominees.

New?

If anything, lack of enthusiasm for both party candidates is even stronger today. People will be voting against rather than for: A vote for Biden will likely be a vote against Trump … and vice-versa.

Please, don’t misunderstand: When push comes to shove, the bottom line is simple: Joe Biden is a good man. Donald Trump is not. He’s a very, very bad man. But both are politicians playing to their bases, with difficulty attracting independent voters and suburban women who will probably decide the winners. And if push comes to shove, with Biden as the Democrats’ nominee v.Trump or any other Republican, I will vote for Joe Biden.

However …

Our electorate historically has had 40% voting for Democrats, 40% voting for Republicans, and 20% being unaffiliated, issues-based voters.  But today, the situation has significantly worsened for the two major parties as both have shed support from center-oriented voters who perceive both the right and the left as increasingly pandering to activists and the extremes of each party.

Recent polling data indicates a new split: 35% leaning Democrat, 35% leaning Republican, and a full 30% who are unaffiliated, issues-based voters.  Yes, close to a third of voters today are issue-driven voters looking for solutions to the nation’s problems. These voters may well determine the winner in 2024. What’s more, in another recent poll, close to half of American voters say they would consider backing a third-party candidate if President Biden and former President Trump head toward a rematch in 2024.

Nonetheless, I have changed my mind about supporting third-party candidates in the 2024 presidential election.

Why?

Because I think there’s a better option:

For the greater good of the USA and democracy, per se, I believe President Biden needs to complete his term, step aside, and defer to another candidate.

Not because of his age or health, which concerns many voters, and is a very legitimate concern. But because Americans need to shed these years of divisiveness – of which Joe Biden is part – and move on.

Last summer, after a reporter cited poll numbers suggesting just 26 percent of Democrats wanted him to be the nominee, the president rejected the idea that a large majority of his own party’s voters don’t want him on the ballot in 2024. “Read the polls, Jack!” Biden said. “You guys are all the same. That poll showed that 92 percent of Democrats, if I ran, would vote for me.” This statement, however, was somewhat misleading: Ninety-two percent of Democrats said they would vote for Biden in a general election rematch with Trump, not that they wanted him to run. In fact, 2022 exit polls showed that two-thirds of USA voters don’t want him to run for reelection.  

Nevertheless, Joe Biden launched his re-election campaign with a video in which he says the country faces a pivotal moment in the 2024 vote.

The Democratic Party, however, still needs convincing that he is the best candidate they have. Polls show about half of Democrats want the party to nominate someone else – although many of those have said they will still vote for him. Because of Trump … not because of Biden’s record.

Joe Biden has made it clear he intends to stand for re-election in 2024, but despite his fighting spirit, Biden’s intention may not necessarily hold up.

Within the Democratic party, concerns have grown over the president’s age (he’ll be 82 shortly after the 2024 election), his low approval ratings (he’s mired in the low 40s in job approval), and ongoing political struggles … and you get this: a series of stories examining whether Biden runs again and, if not, who might take his place.

Recent news of classified documents found in his Delaware home have certainly not helped in soothing these concerns. Nor did the dogged plea deals arranged with his son, Hunter.

If Biden does not run, the 2024 Democratic primaries would become a much more open contest. And there are several potential candidates:

Kamala D. Harris would be the presumptive nominee. Biden’s announcement may raise some doubts that Harris will be his running mate again in 2024. According to The Washington Post, “There have been questions about how voters might feel about that, given that her ascension to the top job is a more real prospect with Biden in his 80s, and she’s generally less popular than both Biden and recent vice presidents. Polls suggest she’s the nominal front-runner in a Biden-less race, but without anything approaching a convincing margin.

Gretchen Whitmer Democrats have shown they’re more interested in pragmatism, including by nominating Biden in 2020. And it’s hard to see them doing worse than the well-regarded and liked female governor of a swing state (Michigan) who has won two campaigns there by about 10 points. Whitmer has said she wouldn’t run even in a Biden-less race, but it’s not difficult to see a huge recruiting effort emerging. Plenty will believe she is the answer.

Amy Klobuchar The Minnesota senator is among those seen as quietly doing the things one would do to remain a part of the conversation in a post-Biden race. She makes sense as a stand-in for Biden and his more pragmatic brand of politics, but she might have competition for that lane with others.

Pete Buttigieg The transportation secretary is seemingly aiming higher — whether in 2024 or 2028 — after passing on running for an open Senate seat in his adoptive home state of Michigan. While he finished fifth in pledged delegates in 2020, it’s worth recalling that he just about won both of the first two states, Iowa and New Hampshire. His lack of appeal to minority voters is a major obstacle that must be dealt with—especially given his open sexual orientation. But he’s also the most established and capable national messenger on this list. And perhaps more people would give him a look now that he’s no longer just a 30-something mayor of a medium-size city. If elected, Buttigieg would be the youngest ever president and the first openly gay man to become president.

Gavin Newsom Despite his protestations, the California governor is widely viewed as being among the most likely candidates to run if Biden falters. He’s gone to great lengths to build his national profile in recent months, while pushing his party toward a more in-your-face approach to taking on Republicans. It’s easy to see how that message might play well. Newsom is less disliked than Biden and Harris, but is still polling in the single digits. But this may be explained by his slightly lower name recognition among voters. Data from the January Granite State Poll in New Hampshire shows that some voters felt they do not know enough about him to form an opinion yet. If Newsom enters the race for the Democratic nomination, his early campaign strategies would need to be focused on raising his public profile across the nation.

No sitting president in modern American history has been primaried successfully, although intraparty challenges usually end up hurting the incumbent in the general election. If something happens to change Biden’s mind or circumstances in the long months before the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, however, “then it’s open season,” Tampa-area Democrat Doris Carroll told The Wall Street Journal

Whether vice president or wild card favorite, no Democrat except Biden has formally declared an intention to run. The ball is in the president’s court. But if he decides not to run amid increased calls for him to step aside, the Democratic party certainly has options, and the primaries could shape up to become a highly competitive contest.

As they should be.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.