Dealing with Portuguese Debt (Collectors)

Time and again, debt collector Intrum has proven its operations to be unethical and, possibly, even illegal.

Myriad complaints against the company frequently highlight aggressive debt recovery tactics and administrative errors.

Complaints about Intrum and its tactics are found on multiple platforms:

In the Livro de Reclamações: https://portaldaqueixa.com/brands/intrum-justitia-servicos-de-gestao-e-recuperacao-de-credito/complaints

On Deco Proteste: https://www.deco.proteste.pt/reclamar/empresas/intrum-portugal/87C498E1-928B2A617

On TrustPilot: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/intrum.pt?languages=all

On Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/PortugalExpats/comments/1tqvsqq/has_anyone_dealt_with_intrum/

Consumers frequently report receiving relentless phone calls and text messages regarding old or unrecognized debts, sometimes stretching back over a decade. They complain that Intrum attempts to collect legally expired or prescribed debts, often using intimidating language.

Multiple reviews mention being dunned for amounts that were already paid, settled, or cleared through legal agreements. Customers describe unhelpful or rude support staff when trying to resolve discrepancies, alongside difficulty getting through to the operator.

After parting ways with MEO (another consumer complaint accumulator), I was glad my ordeal with this oversize telecommunications provider was over and done with. I had copies of emails from MEO responding to my earlier complaints through Deco Proteste and the Livro de Reclamações about being unable to cancel my contract following its required “loyalty” period. MEO’s emails confirmed that my contract had been cancelled, all of its equipment returned, and that I owed nothing on my account.

Months later, however, I began to receive daily debtor letters from collection agency Intrum, threatening to make my life miserable if I didn’t respond to their messages sent using WhatsApp.

It should be noted that their messages were marked “No Reply” and that it was impossible to reach Intrum staffers on the phone number provided despite 20-plus rings, let alone to reach anyone who could speak English.

So, again I turned to the Livro de Reclamações and Deco Proteste, where I registered complaints online.

Intrum’s rebuttal to my complaints had been repeated over and again to others in a boilerplate note stating, in essence, “Don’t blame us … we’re just the messengers,” an unethical, inaccurate, irresponsible, and totally inaccurate response.

Neither factual nor forthcoming, Intrum neglected to reveal its role in this matter: Is it really representing MEO, or has it purchased MEO’s debt portfolio? If the latter, Intrum is actually the owner–not the agent.

Intrum acts as a debt buyer, purchasing massive portfolios of non-performing loans, utility bills, and telecom accounts (termed carteiras de malparado) from companies like MEO, NOS, banks, and utilities for a small percentage of the actual debt amount (often 5 to 10 cents on the euro). Once bought, the debt legally belongs to Intrum. MEO has already written it off as a loss and wiped their hands of it. If Intrum buys a €500 debt for €25 and manages to scare or pressure the consumer into paying the full €500 (or even a discounted €200 settlement), they make a massive return on investment.

In other cases, usually involving more recent debts (under 6 months old), Intrum is hired by MEO or other firms to serve as an external collections department. In this scenario, MEO still owns the debt, and Intrum earns a commission fee for successfully recovering the past-due payment.

The point, however, was moot in my case, as I’d already proven that I didn’t owe anyone anything.

Documented by correspondence from MEO which accompanied my complaint, any issues the telecommunications giant had had with me were already resolved—including all bills (faturas) paid.

My complaint wasn’t with MEO; it was with Intrum and its messages. Based on questionable and unsubstantiated data presumably provided by its clients (MEO, in my case), Intrum repeatedly threatened, harassed, and intimidated me using privileged, private information (i.e., my telephone number) to bombard me with objectionable SPAM.

I have appealed again to the competent authorities through Portugal’s official complaints portal, asking that Intrum be sanctioned for its abuses and repeated violations of consumer protection.

Handling a debt collection agency like Intrum Portugal requires a calm, documented, and cautious approach. Here are the most effective tips to manage their contacts and protect your rights:

Shift Everything to Writing

Avoid discussing details over the phone. Verbal agreements are difficult to prove, and debt collectors may use high-pressure tactics. Instruct the agency to send all communications, payment proposals, and debt breakdowns via email or registered letter (Carta Registada com Aviso de Receção). State your stance clearly. Use a simple phrase like: “I will only communicate regarding this matter in writing. Please send the complete breakdown of this alleged debt to my email/address.”

Demand Formal Proof of the Debt

Never make a partial or full payment just to get them to stop them from contacting you. In Portugal, making a payment can be legally interpreted as an acknowledgement of the debt, which resets the legal clock.

Under Portuguese law, you have the right to know exactly where the debt originates. Demand copies of the original contract, the last outstanding invoice, and the formal document showing that the original creditor assigned (sold) the debt to Intrum.

Check for “Prescription” (Legal Expiry)

In Portugal, many common consumer debts have very short expiration periods (prescription). So, verify the age: If the creditor does not legally demand payment within this window, they lose the right to collect it.

Know the timelines

> 6 months: Water, electricity, gas, and telecommunications (internet/phone) bills.

> 2 years: Services provided by commercial entities or educational institutions.

> 5 years: Alimony, rent, or interest on loans.

If the debt is past these limits, Intrum cannot legally force you to pay. However, prescription does not happen automatically—you must formally invoke it. Send them a registered letter or email stating that the alleged debt is prescribed under Portuguese law.

Know Your Privacy Rights (RGPD)

Debt collectors cannot call you at unreasonable hours, contact your workplace, or disclose your situation to family members or neighbors. Harassment is illegal here.

If they are calling a number you never gave to the original creditor, or if the calls are excessive, you can explicitly state that they are violating your data privacy rights under GDPR (RGPD) and demand they cease phone contact. In other words, revoke consent.

Create a Log

Document every interaction. Keep a record of the dates, times, emails and phone numbers Intrum uses to call you. Save all messages. Don’t delete any SMS, WhatsApp messages, or emails they send, as these can serve as evidence if you need to file a formal complaint.

Contact Them Directly

Send the debt collection agency a letter from your personal email so you have a digital time-stamp. If possible, ask for a read receipt. Contac t Intrum at this email: info.pt@intrum.com

If they do not reply to the email or continue harassing you, send your complaint via Carta Registada com Aviso de Receção (Registered Letter with Acknowledgement of Receipt) to their official Lisbon address:
Alameda dos Oceanos, 59 – Edifício Espace, Piso 1, Bloco 2 A/B – Parque das Nações 1990-207 Lisboa, Portugal. Keep the postal receipt.

Businesses are expected to operate in good faith. Through its actions, Intrum has proven its culpability.

If I weren’t a foreigner with legal and fiscal residency in Portugal, I would take Intrum to court and invite all others who have been inflicted by its indignities to join me in what’s known as a “class action suit.”

Intrum would never know what had hit them!

There Ought to Be a Law!

I am experiencing a number a problems with my Facebook account, which I’ve diligently reported to Facebook using its “Report Problem” form (with screenshots).

Last week in “Trusted House Sitters,” a group I belong to, someone posted a request for recommendations. Several comments followed. I added mine, saying, “We highly recommend Norma Schramm, who’s taken TLC of our dogs both in Wisconsin (USA) and now in Portugal:

Bruce Joffe

Aug 27, 2026

Highly recommended: Norma Schramm!

Shared on TrustedHousesitters

Immediately, my comment was deleted and replaced with this notice from Facebook:

Aug 27, 2026

We removed your comment

Why this happened

We don’t allow people to take actions at high volume that might bother others.

This goes against our Community Standards on spam.

HUH? High Volume?

It’s been over two months since — no reason was given — Facebook has allowed me to post or comment other than on my own profile feed or the two groups I created and administer.

I was given the option to appeal Facebook’s decision.

I did.

Today — 4 days later — I heard back from Facebook:

Aug 31, 2026

We did not restore your comment

Hi Bruce

We reviewed your comment again.

We confirmed that it does not follow our Community Standards on spam.

We know this is disappointing, but we want to keep Facebook safe and welcoming for everyone.

To keep people safe, we ask everyone using our technology to follow rules, such as our Community Standards or Terms of Service and relevant local laws.

By following the rules, you can help prevent your content being removed, activity restricted, or your account being suspended.

A button at the bottom of the notice allowed me to check my profile status. Here’s what it said:

Bruce Joffe

Profile has some issues

Account status

Be careful! Going against the rules too many times can cause restrictions on your account.

Actions we’ve taken

Information for people in the EU

In addition to the option to ask us for a review, you also have other rights.

Other options you have

You may be able to challenge our decision in court.

You may be able to refer our decision to a certified dispute settlement body.

I’m seriously considering challenging Facebook’s decision–whether in court or through a certified dispute settlement body.

Someone has to hold Facebook accountable.

There’s no way to contact responsible parties at this social media platform that’s making billions upon billions of dollars, despite its recent admission of culpability and enormous financial settlement.

The problems are never resolved and the only replies I receive are AI-generated from Facebook bots.

Unacceptable! So, I asked AI (Google):

“What email(s) can I use to contact humans working at Facebook directly?”

AI’s response?

“To be completely direct: Facebook (Meta) does not provide active, publicly monitored customer service email addresses that guarantee a human reply.

“If you want a guaranteed way to bypass the bots and speak directly with a human representative, you must subscribe to Meta Verified. Your monthly subscription grants you direct access to live chat and email support with actual human agents.”

Oh, yeah? Like I’m going to pay Facebook €15/month (€180/year!) to fix its systemic problems? So I get to correspond with a human to to correct Facebook’s glitches?

No way, José! That’s highway robbery.

IMO, if a business cannot provide free, active human support — whatever the issue — it shouldn’t be allowed to operate online.

I wonder if this is something that might interest EU authorities?